Since mid-2021 if not earlier, there have been reports from doctors about weird observations in blood samples of the unvaccinated, from unhealthy blood cells to the presence of creepy structures. On a possible related note, many embalmers reported white fibrous material in the dead who had been vaccinated.
Some claim the presence of graphene in these so-called vaccines and others go further and state that it is nanotechnology as graphene is used in nanotechnology.
Even accepting all observations as true, there are the usual questions: What is it? What is the specific intent of putting such material in the vials? Is it only in isolated vials or all vials?—after all, Prof Dr Pablo Campra Madrid’s interim report back in June 2021 was based on one Pfizer vial. Are the type and amount of material the same in every vial?
A study by Y.-M. Lee and D. Broudy titled “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study” published on 18 July 2024 sheds more light on this even though it doesn’t answer all the questions.
The paper is 65 pages in total. The main text is about 50 pages, the remaining are tables and references. The paper is not as long as the page count indicates as there are quite a few photos. If one does not have time or is easily creeped out, then the Abstract is sufficiently well-written. The Discussion is an entertaining read as the authors do not mince words in their criticisms of the “vaccines”. Indeed, the authors rarely use the word, instead using “injections”.
The study, as stated in the title, used mostly Pfizer and Moderna injections and 54 vials were used in total:
50 residual injectable vials (43 Pfizer, 7 Moderna), acquired immediately after their use.
4 new unopened injectable vials (2 Pfizer, 1 AstraZeneca, 1 Novavax).
distilled water, saline solution and 1 flu vaccine served as control.
These were then “incubated” in vitro in:
whole blood (unvaccinated), plasma (unvaccinated), semen (3 vaccinated, 1 unvaccinated) and skin extracts (vaccinated).
chemical solutions: chlorine dioxide (ClO2), calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).
mineral solutions: Si water, colloidal gold, colloidal silver, EDTA, mica (Korean traditional mineral complex) and myrrh.
EMF exposure was also studied: 36.5°C (human body temperature), wireless recharger with mobile phone at 5G, external HD and UV light.
Observations were made over different periods, from minutes up to around one year, depending on the experiment.
For incubation in blood:
Noteworthy was the behavior of each kind of blood cell, mobilizing as though in a battle on a frontline moving against each of the injectables—red blood cells against Pfizer and AstraZeneca, white blood cells against Moderna, and platelets against Novavax.
For incubation in semen, “sperm motility showed rapid reduction” when exposed to Pfizer. Generally,
[p]rogressive death to sperm cells occurred within a few hours after exposure, even in low concentrations, to the various injectables.
For incubation in distilled water and saline, self-assembled structures developed from Pfizer and Moderna. None were observed from AstraZeneca and Novavax.
Week 1: 1 dimensional, rod-like entities or 2 dimensional simple flat rectangular shaped structures appeared. Weeks 2~3: 2 to 3-dimensional structures seemed to be added to the existing entities at the bottom. From day 14, well-made 3-dimensional structures were dislodged from the original frame at the bottom and rose into the upper layer (fluid layer depth about 6~8 mm).
After 2 to 6 months in which the “peak stage of full assembly” seemed to occur, the structures disintegrated. EMF exposure seems to stimulate and sustain development in Pfizer samples.
For incubation in chlorine dioxide (ClO2), calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which are all toxic, structures still developed although less so than the control.
However, during the late stage of incubation in a low concentration (1/400~1/200x), chips were still rarely found at the bottom by day 230, but in a higher concentration, non-self-assembled structures were found at the bottom except crystals peculiar to ClO2. A greater number of chips were found in the Moderna than in the Pfizer sample in the lower concentration (lower than 1/200x). Filaments were found at the later stage of incubation in the lower concentration, but no structures were found in a higher concentration (higher than 1/16x). Pfizer showed more filaments than Moderna in the lower concentration (lower than 1/16x).
For incubation in mineral solutions also, structures developed. Colloidal gold, colloidal silver and mica did disrupt the development and dissolve various nanostructures.
In the colloidal silver and mica, bacterial or fungal contamination developed progressively. This development suggested that the intended engineered effect (artificial antifungal antibacterial effect) was diminished progressively by these kinds of minerals, not aseptic ones for oral route only. In the EDTA solution, the self-assembly process in the bottom layer was not significantly disturbed as filaments finally began to appear prominently and profusely in the Moderna sample during the 253 days incubation.
Not surprisingly, structural development was faster at body temperature (36.5°C) than at room temperature (15–20°C). One evening at body temperature yielded the same development as 2–3 weeks at room temperature.
Also not surprising is that exposure to a wireless phone recharger at room temperature also stimulated development, although there was no immediate impact with Pfizer.
Even after 1 hour of exposure to the wireless recharger with a cellular phone in operational mode, Moderna showed noticeable immediate changes.
When exposed to external HD at room temperature (23–25°C), there were no observable changes in Pfizer. However, for Moderna there were
…modest disruptive changes—slightly blurred boundary lines across structures with softer edges sitting at the bottom of the culture dishes.
Interestingly and disturbingly, when the Pfizer sample was exposed to a wireless phone recharger,
the diverse structures reassembled yet again in similar shapes to those before exposure to the external hard drive.
Another observation was the presence of protein. Initially, none were detected and there should not be according to the FDA description.
Without any bacterial contamination, protein could only be produced by the injectable itself in the distilled water or normal saline media. According to Cell-Free Protein Synthesis, described by Endo (2021), the bubbles observed in our study could be the result of self-synthesized proteins, which could be toxic. Most interesting was the initially undetected, then detectable (day 23~day 82), and ultimately once again undetectable progression of protein synthesis. We discovered what, initially, appeared to be a coincidental relationship between (a) the developmental patterns of self-assembled nanostructures (peak stage of development, 2 to 6 months), (b) the behavior of hydrogel (initially transparent for 2 to 3 weeks, later gel-like emulsion in nature until day 150, and finally returning to its transparent consistency) and (c) protein production to some degree. Further studies are needed to clarify the central issues regarding all three of these apparent dynamic relationships. Turning to Burkhardt’s analysis (2022), we remind readers of the effects of the spike protein and the synthesis of many kinds of proteinaceous materials discovered in blood clots (approximately 323 kinds of proteins)—especially 4 kinds from endothelial tissue damage.
Given the observations, the authors offer the following model or general pattern:
The obvious weakness of the study is that it is in vitro and is therefore very different from inside a body. The other is that the maximum magnification is 400X. Nevertheless, various media were used and under a range of conditions. Of no less importance, this study did not rely on merely one or two vials but 54 vials in total.
In short, in various media and to varying degrees, Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections produced artificial self-assembling entities of simple 1D and 2D as well as 3D structures in the form of ribbons, filaments and chips, amongst other forms. Exposure to the wireless phone charger and 5G stimulated development and re-assembly has been observed. All this suggests semi-conductive material with programming, possibly including responding to external EM signals.
Be sure to subscribe to our mailing list so you get each new Opinyun that comes out!
Comments